Contributors

Re: OCA module contributors and migrations

In my opinion:

- The "authors" list in manifest is something you want to keep small and just for important companies which contributed to the development, since it's also ugly when it's very long

- The contributors list in README can be as long as you want because it's not directly in anyone's view IMO - and I think any "thank you" that we can give people that invest their time in OCA, should be given

Just if people themselves feel their contribution is not worth a lot they can just not add it

Op 7/13/21 om 5:22 PM schreef Simone Rubino:

Agree that any contribution should be worth being mentioned in Contributors.

I think it can't be measured in Lines of Code: a perfect one-line fix can require as much work as 50 or more Lines of Code.

Just think how much time we spend on finding typos! And then the fix is maybe just one character.

On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 17:01, Frederik Kramer <frederik.kramer@initos.com> wrote:

Hi Kevin, 

this is not an easy question to have a definitive answer on.
 
I'd say as long as the amount of work somebody put into 
isn't negligable (say migrated 20 lines of small module) 
he / she should be named as a contributor.

I think we should probably more focus on how we can make the net
amount of work somebody spent on the artifact(s) more transparent, so
that it becomes a more visible to everybody if a contributor is 
only contributing a few or a huge pile of work.

But even then sometimes the smallest changes carefully thought and
crafted do the largest impact. 

Best Frederik

Am Dienstag, den 13.07.2021, 14:47 +0000 schrieb Kevin Khao:


> Hi,


> 


> This is about what counts as valid "contribution", that is, what you


> need to do to be added in the CONTRIBUTORS.rst file.


> 


> In some (most?) cases, a migration is not a huge amount of work. In


> some cases, it can represent a lot of work.


> 


> So it is arguable whether you should add yourself during migration


> commits.


> 


> In discussions on Github, I have seen differing opinions on this


> subject. Some think it "cheapens" the contributor list that you add


> yourself if you just did a migration commit.


> 


> I would lean towards adding yourself in any case a contributor


> anyways, since even if it's small it is still work, and should be


> recognized. Commit history is still there if you're interested in how


> much anyone contributed.


> 


> Maybe there is already a consensus that I'm not aware of ? What do


> you think ?


> 


> _______________________________________________


> Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15


> Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org


> Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe


-- 
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer
Geschäftsführer
        
initOS GmbH
An der Eisenbahn 1
21224 Rosengarten
        
Phone:  +49 4105 56156-12
Fax:    +49 4105 56156-10
Mobil:  +49 179 3901819
        
Email: frederik.kramer@initos.com
Web:   www.initos.com
        
Geschäftsführung:
Dr.-Ing. Frederik Kramer & Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Torsten Francke

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Rosengarten – Klecken
Amtsgericht Tostedt, HRB 205226
Steuer-Nr: 15/200/53247
USt-IdNr.: DE815580155

_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

by Tom Blauwendraat - 05:36 - 13 Jul 2021

Reference

OCA module contributors and migrations

Hi,

This is about what counts as valid "contribution", that is, what you need to do to be added in the CONTRIBUTORS.rst file.

In some (most?) cases, a migration is not a huge amount of work. In some cases, it can represent a lot of work.

So it is arguable whether you should add yourself during migration commits.

In discussions on Github, I have seen differing opinions on this subject. Some think it "cheapens" the contributor list that you add yourself if you just did a migration commit.

I would lean towards adding yourself in any case a contributor anyways, since even if it's small it is still work, and should be recognized. Commit history is still there if you're interested in how much anyone contributed.

Maybe there is already a consensus that I'm not aware of ? What do you think ?

by "Kevin Khao" <kevin.khao@akretion.com.br> - 04:46 - 13 Jul 2021

Archives

Contributors

Re: OCA module contributors and migrations

Re: OCA module contributors and migrations

Re: OCA module contributors and migrations

Reference

OCA module contributors and migrations

Follow us