Skip to Content
  2. Mailing Lists
  3. Contributors
  4. Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?

Archives

Contributors

Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?

Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?

Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?

Well, Being mostly "functional" I would say, first off, there needs to be a place to go and get information, ask questions, profer advise.  Documentation is important, even in Wiki form, but most important is a true and welvoming landing pad and place.  Branches should go out from there to subjects of the different repositories.


As an example.  Information and sharing about upgrade paths and methods.  Fundamental changes, for users and system implementers about requirement changes generation to generation...  Is it possible to skip versions in upgrade sequencing.  say v 8, v10, v12, v14?  If so how?


"Open" needs to be open and not obscure.  Installations and upgrades can be methodical and complex, but they must also be understandable. 


Customization, which is essence, is what OCA is about, should be welcome, and also seen to be something that users can also do without creating a whole repository and running through a week of testing and approvals.  Interface changes, as an example, like moving an "add task" button to a project, or rearranging a menu interface etc.


And on bigger customizations, how to have "funcionals" express a desire for a more efficient work flow.  A "wish list" is different than a "issue" until it becomes one.


Anyway, it is an important subject, how to integrate "functionals" which really everyone is on some level.


Landis Arnold

Nomadic Inc

Colorado USA



Sent from Nine
From: "Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa)" <pedro.baeza@tecnativa.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 6:47 AM
To: Contributors
Subject: Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?


Jean-Charles, here there's no such OCA strategy of not wanting functional people, just as Lois says: there's no more physical time to perform what you want to do to attract more people. I still think laziness is a point, because some functional people have already contributed and be part of the community with a low barrier, but it's very easy to say "I'm not able to contribute because things are not easy". Think that we are all employees of a company that pays our time and have a lot of duties, and some of us have invested spare free time for trying to raise OCA, but this time is limited. So any of you can apply for being in the OCA board next year and conduct this, or simply arise at contributor for that specific task this year. My colleagues at board will love some help on this (I'm not anymore there due to the time restrictions I have and after being there during 3 years).

Regards.

_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

by Landis Arnold - 03:21 - 13 Feb 2020

1 attachments 1 attachments

attachment

Reference

  • How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?
    Dear community,

    I have a pretty hard question :)

    We always say that functional people  is vital to ERP system, for sure in the project. But are functional people have places in OCA?

    Are there forum or any place where functional can fully contribute their business knowledge without friction of tech, github and programmer languages?

    Any pure functional people in OCA can help answer this? :)
    Thanks!

    Note: This question is passed here by my functional peer who want to participate in OCA. But I also don't have that good suggestion too.
    by Kitti Upariphutthiphong - 08:46 - 5 Feb 2020