Skip to Content
  2. Mailing Lists
  3. Contributors
  4. Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?

Archives

Contributors

Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?

Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?

Re: How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?

I don't like Wiki pages as you propose, as we will duplicate data and have inconsistencies between both sources. There must be only one source. What we can do is to create a Wiki page for teaching how to propose a modification in README.rst files of the modules / README.md of the repository for newbie people that is not used to GitHub, and add massively in all the README files this link (we have tools for this) in a special section. Something like:

"""
Is this README not accurated or are there missing things you have detected? Please visit xxx to learn how you can propose changes in it.
"""

I know there's still the barrier of RST formatting, but usual redaction doesn't require it (and we can teach about usual formatting things like bold or italic - GitHub also includes some buttons for them in the top bar).

Regards.
by Pedro M. Baeza - 01:36 - 8 Feb 2020

Reference

  • How can functional people "really" participate in OCA?
    Dear community,

    I have a pretty hard question :)

    We always say that functional people  is vital to ERP system, for sure in the project. But are functional people have places in OCA?

    Are there forum or any place where functional can fully contribute their business knowledge without friction of tech, github and programmer languages?

    Any pure functional people in OCA can help answer this? :)
    Thanks!

    Note: This question is passed here by my functional peer who want to participate in OCA. But I also don't have that good suggestion too.
    by Kitti Upariphutthiphong - 08:46 - 5 Feb 2020